-
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg · Dec 2022
Computed tomography-based classifications of posterior malleolar fractures and their inter- and intraobserver reliability: a comparison of the Haraguchi, Bartoníček/Rammelt, and Mason classifications.
- Holger Kleinertz, Elena Mueller, Marlon Tessarzyk, Karl-Heinz Frosch, and Carsten Schlickewei.
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. h.kleinertz@uke.de.
- Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Dec 1; 142 (12): 3895-3902.
IntroductionComplex ankle fractures often include fractures of the posterior malleolus. The most clinically relevant posterior malleolus fracture classifications are computed tomography (CT) based. These classifications aim to enable clear communication and help develop treatment strategies. This study investigates the inter- and intraobserver reliability of the Haraguchi, Bartoníček/Rammelt and Mason posterior malleolar fracture classifications.Materials And MethodsCT scans of 113 patients with a mean age of 56.2 (SD ± 17.8) years and fractures involving the posterior malleolus were analyzed twice by 4 observers with different levels of training. The posterior malleolar fractures were classified according to Haraguchi et al., Bartoníček/Rammelt et al. and Mason et al. The intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities were determined by calculating Cohen's and Fleiss' kappa values.ResultsWe found substantial multi-rater interobserver agreement for all three classifications. The Haraguchi classification 0.799 (CI 0.744-0.855) showed the highest agreement, followed by the Bartoníček/Rammelt 0.744 (0.695-0.793) and Mason 0.717 (CI 0.666-0.768) classifications. Subgroup analyses showed substantial to perfect agreement for the Haraguchi and substantial agreement for the Bartoníček/Rammelt and Mason classifications independent of observer expertise. The intraobserver reliability was perfect for three and substantial for one of the observers. However, the classifications have certain pitfalls and do not consider the number of fragments, articular surface impressions, or intercalary fragments.ConclusionAll classifications show substantial, if not perfect inter- and intraobserver reliabilities independent of observer level of expertise.© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.