• Critical care medicine · Apr 1998

    Comparative Study

    Accuracy of physiologic deadspace measurement in intubated pediatric patients using a metabolic monitor: comparison with the Douglas bag method.

    • L Lum, A Saville, and S T Venkataraman.
    • Department of Anesthesiology/CCM, University of Pittsburgh, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
    • Crit. Care Med. 1998 Apr 1;26(4):760-4.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the accuracy of physiologic deadspace (VD/VT) measurement, using a metabolic monitor.DesignProspective collection of data.SettingUniversity-affiliated children's hospital with a 51-bed critical care area.PatientsInfants and children who were sedated and paralyzed and were receiving mechanical ventilation through a cuffed endotracheal tube.InterventionsNone.Measurements And Main ResultsMixed expired carbon dioxide tension (PECO2) was measured. With the Douglas bag method, mixed expired gas was collected over 15 mins and was analyzed. With the metabolic monitor, FECO2 was measured for 15 mins and the results were averaged. The PECO2 was calculated by multiplying FECO2 by the barometric pressure. The PaCO2 was measured simultaneously. The PECO2 was corrected for the compressible volume in the ventilator circuit. All gas volumes were corrected for body temperature, pressure, and water vapor pressure. The physiologic deadspace/tidal volume ratio (VD/VT) was calculated for both techniques using the Enghoff modification of the Bohr equation. The accuracy of the VD/VT measured, by using the metabolic monitor, was assessed by comparing this measurement against the VD/VT measured by the Douglas bag method. This comparison was done by simple linear regression and correlation and by bias analysis (Bland and Altman method). The magnitude of compressible volume expressed as a fraction of the tidal volume delivered by the ventilator was compared with the error in VD/VT expressed as the difference between the uncorrected and corrected VD/VT. Sixteen paired measurements were made in 12 children. The VD/VT measured by the metabolic monitor correlated well with the VD/VT measured by the Douglas bag method (r2 = .99; p < .0001). There was no correlation between the bias of VD/VT and the average VD/VT. As the magnitude of compressible volume increased, the error in VD/VT increased (r2 =.61; p < .001).ConclusionsThe VD/VT can be measured reliably and accurately in intubated pediatric patients using a metabolic monitor. The metabolic monitor method is a convenient and simple alternative to the standard Douglas bag method.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.