• Amelia Xin Chun Goh, Jun Wei Yeo, Jocelyn Fangjiao Gao, OngMarcus Eng HockMEH0000-0001-7874-7612Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore., Shu-Ling Chong, Fahad Javaid Siddiqui, and HoAndrew Fu WahAFW0000-0003-4338-3876Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.Pre-Hospital and Emergency Research Centre, Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore..
• Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore gxcamelia@gmail.com.
• Emerg Med J. 2022 Dec 1; 39 (12): 888896888-896.

BackgroundForearm fractures in children often require closed reduction in the emergency setting. The choice of anaesthesia influences the degree of pain relief, which determines the success of reduction. Main methods of anaesthesia include procedural sedation and analgesia, haematoma block, intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA) and regional nerve blocks. However, their comparative effectiveness is unclear. This study aims to synthesise peer-reviewed evidence and identify the most effective, in terms of pain reduction, and safest anaesthetic method.MethodsMEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 15 June 2021. Randomised controlled trials comparing anaesthetic methods for the closed reduction of paediatric forearm fractures in the emergency setting were included. Two reviewers independently screened, collected data and assessed the risk of bias for the selected outcomes. The primary outcome was pain during reduction. Secondary outcomes included pain after reduction, adverse effects, satisfaction, adequacy of sedation/anaesthesia, success of reduction and resource use.Results1288 records were screened and 9 trials, which studied 936 patients in total, were included. Four trials compared the main methods of anaesthesia. Within the same method of anaesthesia, one compared administrative routes, one compared procedural techniques, one compared different drugs, one compared the use of adjuncts and one compared different doses of the same drug. One study found better pain outcomes with infraclavicular blocks compared with procedural sedation and analgesia. Lidocaine was superior in analgesic effect to prilocaine in IVRA in one study. One study found lower pain scores with moderate-dose than low-dose lidocaine in IVRA.ConclusionFew randomised controlled trials compared anaesthetic methods in the closed reduction of paediatric forearm fractures. High heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Overall, current data are insufficient to guide the choice of anaesthetic method in emergency settings. More adequately powered trials, conducted using standardised methods, are required.© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

14 keywords...

hide…