• Courtney J Stevens, Jonathan A Shaffer, Katharine S Edwards, Kevin S Masters, Katherine K Leon, Malissa J Wood, and Tina Pittman Wagers.
• Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
• J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Aug 1; 31 (8): 116511721165-1172.

AbstractBackground: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a nonatherosclerotic etiology of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) that primarily affects younger women with few traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate how younger age impacts the perception of care women receive in the emergency department (ED) at the time of their first or only SCAD. Methods: SCAD survivors were recruited using SCAD Alliance social media platforms to complete a one-time online survey regarding their experiences of seeking treatment for SCAD in the ED and their post-SCAD recovery. A total of 409 participants consented to participate in the parent study and data collected from the 367 participants who reported female gender were further analyzed. Results: Fewer participants <50 years old than would be expected under the null hypothesis (i.e., 65.5% observed vs. 71.2% expected, p = 0.009) reported perceived serious treatment by ED staff, more participants <50 years than would be expected under the null hypothesis (i.e., 12.0% observed vs. 9.3% expected, p = 0.049) reported perceived dismissive treatment by ED staff, and more participants <50 years than would be expected under the null hypothesis (i.e., 13.3% observed vs. 10.8% expected, p = 0.02) reported discharge from the ED without a diagnosis. Conclusions: Results of this study highlight the different experiences of younger SCAD survivors' engaging with providers in the ED. Further research regarding strategies for increasing ED providers' clinical interrogation of SCAD when treating and evaluating younger female patients presenting with ACS symptoms is indicated.

21 keywords...

hide…