• Benoit Pétré, Marine Paridans, Nicolas Gillain, Eddy Husson, Anne-Françoise Donneau, Nadia Dardenne, Christophe Breuer, Fabienne Michel, Margaux Dandoy, Fabrice Bureau, Laurent Gillet, Dieudonné Leclercq, and Michèle Guillaume.
• Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
• Patient Prefer Adher. 2022 Jan 1; 16: 625-631.

AbstractCurrent public health debate centers on COVID-19 testing methods and strategies. In some communities, high transmission risk may justify routine testing, and this requires test methods that are safe and efficient for both patients and the administrative or health-care workers administering them. Saliva testing appears to satisfy those criteria. There is, however, little documentation on the acceptability of this method among beneficiaries. This article presents the lessons learned from a pilot study on the use of saliva testing for routine screening of nursing home and secondary school personnel in Wallonia (the French-speaking part of Belgium), conducted in December 2020 to April 2021, respectively. Administrators at the facilities in question seemed to think highly of saliva testing and wished to continue it after the pilot study was over. This result reinforces the criteria (the noninvasive aspect, in particular) supporting a key role for saliva testing in monitoring community spread of the virus. Nevertheless, wider-scale deployment of this particular method will only be possible if the testing strategy as a whole takes a health promotion approach.© 2022 Pétré et al.

4 keywords...

hide…