-
Critical care medicine · Aug 2022
Outcomes After Direct Discharge Home From Critical Care Units: A Population-Based Cohort Analysis.
- Claudio M Martin, Melody Lam, Britney Le, Ruxandra Pinto, Vincent Lau, Ian M Ball, Hannah Wunsch, Robert A Fowler, and Damon C Scales.
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
- Crit. Care Med. 2022 Aug 1; 50 (8): 125612641256-1264.
ObjectivesTo compare health service use and clinical outcomes for patients with and without direct discharge to home (DDH) from ICUs in Ontario.DesignPopulation-based, observational, cohort study using propensity scoring to match patients who were DDH to those not DDH and a preference-based instrumental variable (IV) analysis using ICU-level DDH rate as the IV.SettingICUs in Ontario.PatientsPatients discharged home from a hospitalization either directly or within 48 hours of care in an ICU between April 1, 2015, and March 31, 2017.InterventionDDH from ICU.Measurements And Main ResultsAmong 76,737 patients in our cohort, 46,859 (61%) were DDH from the ICU. In the propensity matched cohort, the odds for our primary outcome of hospital readmission or emergency department (ED) visit within 30 days were not significantly different for patients DDH (odds ratio [OR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.96-1.04), and there was no difference in mortality at 90 days for patients DDH (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.97-1.21). The effect on hospital readmission or ED visits was similar in the subgroup of patients discharged from level 2 (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.92-1.04) and level 3 ICUs (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.96-1.09) and in the subgroups with cardiac conditions (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.96-1.12) and noncardiac conditions (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.94-1.03). Similar results were obtained in the IV analysis (coefficient for hospital readmission or ED visit within 30 d = -0.03 ± 0.03 ( se ); p = 0.3).ConclusionsThere was no difference in outcomes for patients DDH compared with ward transfer prior to discharge when two approaches were used to minimize confounding within a large health systemwide observational cohort. We did not evaluate how patients are selected for DDH. Our results suggest that with careful patient selection, this practice might be feasible for routine implementation to ensure efficient and safe use of limited healthcare resources.Copyright © 2022 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.