• Ann. Intern. Med. · May 2022

    A Reporting Tool for Adapted Guidelines in Health Care: The RIGHT-Ad@pt Checklist.

    • Yang Song, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Monica Ballesteros, Francoise Cluzeau, Robin W M Vernooij, Thurayya Arayssi, Soumyadeep Bhaumik, Yaolong Chen, Davina Ghersi, Etienne V Langlois, Paulina Fuentes Padilla, Holger J Schünemann, Elie A Akl, Laura Martínez García, RIGHT-Ad@pt Working Group*, Yasser Amer, Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez, Steven Barnes, Jorge Barreto, Deborah Collis, Suzanne Dyer, Christine Fahim, Ivan Florez, Veronica Gallegos-Rivero, Miloslav Klugar, Ton Kuijpers, Joseph L Mathew, Zachary Munn, Sarah Norris, Daniel F Patiño-Lugo, C S Pramesh, Jaime Rodriguez, Sudipto Roy, Ein-Soon Shin, Ojino Sosa, Per Olav Vandvik, Marcela Velez, Rachel Woodcraft, and RIGHT-Ad@pt Working Group.
    • Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre (CCIb)-Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), and PhD Programme in Methodology of Biomedical Research and Public Health, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain (Y.S.).
    • Ann. Intern. Med. 2022 May 1; 175 (5): 710-719.

    BackgroundAdaptation of existing guidelines can be an efficient way to develop contextualized recommendations. Transparent reporting of the adaptation approach can support the transparency and usability of the adapted guidelines.ObjectiveTo develop an extension of the RIGHT (Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealThcare) statement for the reporting of adapted guidelines (including recommendations that have been adopted, adapted, or developed de novo), the RIGHT-Ad@pt checklist.DesignA multistep process was followed to develop the checklist: establishing a working group, generating an initial checklist, optimizing the checklist (through an initial assessment of adapted guidelines, semistructured interviews, a Delphi consensus survey, an external review, and a final assessment of adapted guidelines), and approval of the final checklist by the working group.SettingInternational collaboration.ParticipantsA total of 119 professionals participated in the development process.MeasurementsParticipants' consensus on items in the checklist.ResultsThe RIGHT-Ad@pt checklist contains 34 items grouped in 7 sections: basic information (7 items); scope (6 items); rigor of development (10 items); recommendations (4 items); external review and quality assurance (2 items); funding, declaration, and management of interest (2 items); and other information (3 items). A user guide with explanations and real-world examples for each item was developed to provide a better user experience.LimitationThe RIGHT-Ad@pt checklist requires further validation in real-life use.ConclusionThe RIGHT-Ad@pt checklist has been developed to improve the reporting of adapted guidelines, focusing on the standardization, rigor, and transparency of the process and the clarity and explicitness of adapted recommendations.Primary Funding SourceNone.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.