• Benjamin Levin, Jamel Ortoleva, Alessandro Tagliavia, Katia Colon, Jerome Crowley, Kenneth Shelton, and Adam A Dalia.
• Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
• J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2022 Jul 1; 36 (7): 1942-1948.

ObjectivesAcute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) previously have been associated with in-hospital and long-term mortality of patients undergoing support with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Patient selection criteria and survival prediction scores for VA-ECMO often include AKI or CKD, but exclude patients requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). The need for RRT in ECMO patients is associated with increased intensive unit care and in-hospital mortality. The effect RRT has on mortality beyond hospital survival is not well-reported. The authors hypothesized that the timing of initiation (pre-ECMO v during ECMO) of RRT can have a significant impact on short- and long-term mortality.DesignThe authors categorized patients into 3 groups: those receiving RRT before initiation of ECMO, those initiated on RRT while on ECMO, and those who did not need RRT while on ECMO. The authors compared survival to decannulation, 30 days and 1 year between the 3 groups. A multivariate survival analysis also was conducted.SettingThis was a single center retrospective review of all patients receiving VA-ECMO.ParticipantsA total of 347 adult VA-ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients.InterventionsNone, retrospective.Measurements And Main ResultsThe authors' cohort included 347 total patients, 39 required RRT before ECMO, 139 while on ECMO, and 169 did not require RRT while on ECMO. If RRT was initiated before ECMO, survival to decannulation was 48.72%, 46.6% if RRT was initiated on ECMO, and 73.96% for patients who did not need RRT while on ECMO. One-year survival was 25.64%, 23.74%, and 46.75%, respectively. There was no significant difference in survival between patients initiated on RRT before ECMO and those who required RRT while on ECMO.ConclusionsThe authors demonstrated that the need for RRT before or while on ECMO has reduced short- and long-term survival when compared with those who did not need RRT while on ECMO. The authors believe that RRT is a marker for severe multiorgan failure and that, despite the benefits of RRT, high mortality will occur. This lack of mortality difference between patients previously on RRT and those newly requiring RRT may help clinicians in deciding to initiate ECMO for patients previously on RRT. Further investigation into complication rates between the groups is required.Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

15 keywords...

hide…