• Ahmet Ali Tuncer and Elif Emel Ayar Erten.
• Dr. Ahmet Ali Tuncer, Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric Surgery, a.Medical Faculty, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.
• Pak J Med Sci. 2017 Nov 1; 33 (6): 1418-1423.

ObjectiveIn this study, thermocautery, plastic clamping, and conventional (open surgical) circumcision techniques were compared in terms of their complications.MethodsMale patients who underwent circumcisions between May 2014 and May 2015 in two separate pediatric surgery clinics were retrospectively analyzed using the hospital registry system. These patients were evaluated in terms of age, accompanying pathologies, anesthesia techniques, complication rates, duration of surgery, and circumcision techniques. A statistical analysis of the data was performed, with a P<0.05 considered to be statistically significant.ResultsThe patients were divided into three groups according to the circumcision method: conventional surgical circumcision (n=833), thermocautery (n=1011), and plastic clamp (n=218). Complications were observed in 21 cases (1%): bleeding (11), infection (2), trapped penis (6), meatitis (1), and scrotal injury (1). There were significantly fewer complications in the thermocautery technique when compared to the clamping and surgical circumcision techniques. The plastic clamping and thermocautery techniques were superior to a surgical circumcision in terms of the operation time.ConclusionThe thermocautery circumcision technique can be used easily in both the operating theatre and in designated circumcision rooms, with a lower complication rate, when compared to plastic clamping and surgical circumcisions.

3 keywords...

hide…