• Clinics · Jan 2013

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    One-year treatment follow-up of plantar fasciitis: radial shockwaves vs. conventional physiotherapy.

    • Marcus Vinicius Grecco, Guilherme Carlos Brech, and Júlia Maria D'Andrea Greve.
    • Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (IOT/FMUSP), São Paulo/SPSP, Brazil.
    • Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013 Jan 1; 68 (8): 1089-95.

    ObjectiveTo compare radial shockwave treatment with conventional physiotherapy for plantar fasciitis after 12 months of follow-up.MethodThis was a randomized, prospective, comparative clinical study. Forty patients with a diagnosis of plantar fasciitis were divided randomly into two treatment groups: group 1, with 20 patients who underwent ten physiotherapy sessions comprising ultrasound, kinesiotherapy and guidance for home-based stretching; and group 2, with 20 patients who underwent three applications of radial shockwaves, once a week, and guidance for home-based stretching. All patients were assessed regarding pain and functional abilities before treatment, immediately after and 12 months after treatment. The mean age was 49.6 ±11.8 years (range: 25-68 years), 85% were female, 88% were overweight, 63% were affected bilaterally, and 83% used analgesics regularly.ResultsAt the 12-month follow-up, both treatments were effective for improving pain and functional ability among the patients with plantar fasciitis. The improvement with shockwaves was faster.ConclusionShockwave treatment was not more effective than conventional physiotherapy treatment 12 months after the end of the treatment.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…