-
- Michael L Ho, Nadine Lawrence, Carl van Walraven, Doug Manuel, Erin Keely, Janine Malcolm, Robert D Reid, and Alan J Forster.
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
- J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Jun 1; 18 (3): 606-11.
Rationale, Aims And ObjectivesDiabetes mellitus is a growing health and economic burden. Identification of patients with unrecognized diabetes, or those at high risk for diabetes, provides an opportunity for timely intervention. This study assessed the accuracy of using electronic health care data to identify patients with undiagnosed diabetes.MethodsThe study was conducted at a tertiary-care teaching facility in Ottawa, Canada. The study cohort was a stratified random sample of hospitalizations between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2008. We used diagnostic codes, pharmacy orders and serum glucose tests to classify patients into six groups: 'recognized diabetes' (a diabetes diagnostic code or any diabetes medication), 'probable diabetes' (maximum glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol L(-1)), 'possible diabetes' (maximum glucose between 7.8 and 11.1 mmol L(-1)), 'unlikely diabetes' (maximum glucose between 6.0 and 7.8 mmol L(-1)), 'no diabetes' (maximum glucose < 6.0 mmol L(-1)) and 'unknown diabetes status' (no glucose test). We compared this electronic classification to a reference standard chart review performed by a blinded abstractor.ResultsA total of 500 hospitalizations were included. The prevalence of each diabetes group was: recognized - 17%; probable - 4%; possible - 15%; unlikely - 20%; none - 15%; and unknown - 29%. Our electronic algorithm correctly classified 88.8% (95% confidence interval 85.7-91.3) of hospitalizations (weighted-Kappa = 0.885; 95% confidence interval 0.851-0.919). The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values of our algorithm for 'known diabetes' was 0.842, 0.988 and 0.941, respectively. For patients at a 'high risk for diabetes' (maximum glucose > .8 mmol L(-1)), the corresponding values were 0.921, 0.971 and 0.872.ConclusionsPatients with diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes can be accurately identified using electronic health care data.© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.