• Chi-Hong Ho, Shee-Uan Chen, Fu-Shiang Peng, Chih-Yuan Chang, and Yu-Shih Yang.
• Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
• J Chin Med Assoc. 2008 Aug 1; 71 (8): 386-91.

BackgroundThe use of progesterone for luteal support has been demonstrated to be beneficial in assisted reproductive cycles, yet the optimal route of progesterone administration has still not been established. This article is a retrospective study in a tertiary reproductive medical unit to compare luteal progesterone supplementation with vaginal gel or intramuscular progesterone.MethodsA total of 144 in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles were analyzed, 67 cycles using vaginal gel 90 mg twice daily and 77 cycles using intramuscular progesterone 50 mg daily as luteal support.ResultsBoth groups had similar mean age, cause of infertility, baseline hormone levels, dosage of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone, number of retrieved and fertilized oocytes, and number of transferred embryos. The vaginal gel group had significantly lower mid-luteal serum progesterone levels but higher implantation rate (32.5% vs. 18.5%, p = 0.001) and ongoing pregnancy rate (55.2% vs. 32.5%, p = 0.006). Within each group, mid-luteal serum progesterone levels between pregnant or non-pregnant patients were comparable. For patients with serum estradiol levels on day of human chorionic gonadotropin greater than 5,000 pg/mL, vaginal gel still resulted in better ongoing pregnancy and implantation rates.ConclusionThe use of vaginal progesterone gel twice daily for luteal support results in better pregnancy outcomes than intramuscular progesterone. A high local progesterone effect from vaginal gel might improve endometrial receptivity under extraordinarily high serum estradiol levels.

19 keywords...

hide…