• Croatian medical journal · Feb 2017

    Multicenter Study

    The EUROPEP questionnaire for patient's evaluation of general practice care: Bulgarian experience.

    • Rositsa Dimova, Rumyana Stoyanova, and Donka Keskinova.
    • Rositsa Dimova, Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, 15a V. Aprilov Blvd, Plovdiv 4002, Bulgaria. ros_dimova@yahoo.com.
    • Croat. Med. J. 2017 Feb 28; 58 (1): 63-74.

    AimTo validate the Bulgarian EUROPEP-questionnaire and its implementation to measure patient evaluation of general practice care in Bulgarian population.MethodsA multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted at twenty five primary care practices from South-Central Region of Bulgaria. A total of 1000 adult patients aged over 18 years and visiting the practice for more than a year were approached consecutively to take part in the study. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the EUROPEP questionnaire were evaluated. To confirm the construct validity of the questionniare, еxplanatory factor analysis was performed.ResultsCronbach'alpha for "clinical behaviour" is 0.95 and for "organisation of care" 0.81. Factor analysis identifed two factors, which accounted for 77.0% of the total variation in these items. On average, 58.7% of respondents rated the level of care received as excellent. The waiting time in the waiting room was the item most poorly rated (33.8%). The item "keeping patients' records and data confidential" was the most highly rated (88.8%). Patients were less satisfied with "providing quick services for urgent health problems" (78.5% excellent or good) and "getting an appropriate for them appointment" (76.2% excellent or good).ConclusionTwo scales with satisfactory psychometric properties were established in the Bulgarian version of the EUROPEP-questionnaire. The study identified areas requiring improvement in general practice, such as reduction in waiting times and obtaining patient's convenience appointment.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…