• Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. · Aug 2018

    [The Frequency of Ethical Conflicts in Primary Care and the Need for Ethical Consultations - The Perspective of General Practitioners].

    • Konstantin Kallusky, Ildikó Gágyor, Arndt Heßling, and Wolfgang Himmel.
    • Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen.
    • Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 2018 Aug 1; 143 (17): e146-e151.

    Background Our knowledge about ethical conflicts in primary care is limited. The aim of this study was to ascertain the frequency of ethical conflicts and the need of professional consultation services - seen from the perspective of general practitioners (GPs).Methods A random sample of GPs from Lower Saxony, a federal state of Germany, received a standardized questionnaire about their experiences with ethical conflicts and their need for an ethical consultation.Results A total of 456 GPs took part in the survey (response rate = 45.6 %). Eighty percent experienced the conflict of a "withdrawal of medicines due to questionable benefit for the patient" once in 3 months, at least (95 % confidence interval: 76.0 to 83.6 %). Further frequent conflicts were "the continuation of a therapy of questionable benefit" (68 %; 63.3 to 72.0 %) and the "usefulness of diagnostic procedures for early detection of diseases and risk factors in seriously ill patients" (62 %; 57.7 to 66.8 %). About one-third (138/451) of the participants requested an ethical consultation. GPs frequently wished an ethical consultation by phone.Conclusions Although GPs experienced several of the ethical conflicts frequently, only one-third requested an ethical consultation. Low threshold offers may be a way to make ethical consultations more attractive for GPs.© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…