• Liang Yik Lim, Robert Loneragan, Jessica Lee, and Camilla Chan.
• Department of Palliative Care, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia.
• J Palliat Med. 2022 Jul 1; 25 (7): 1127-1131.

AbstractObjectives: To compare outcomes of PleurX and peritoneal port for malignant ascites. Design: Retrospective review of medical records was conducted. Setting/Subjects: Subjects were consecutive patients receiving PleurX or peritoneal port for malignant ascites in a center in Sydney, Australia. Measurements: Demographic data, complication rates, hospitalization rates, and survival were measured. Results: Sixteen cases were analyzed: 6 had peritoneal port (170 catheter days) and 10 had PleurX (477 catheter days). Complication rates were low with both drainage systems. Cellulitis rate was 33% (1.2 events/100 catheter days) for peritoneal port and 10% (0.2 events/100 catheter days) for PleurX. Hospital admission days were 27 days/100 catheter days for peritoneal port and 5.2 days/100 catheter days for PleurX. Conclusions: Both PleurX and peritoneal port seem feasible options in draining malignant ascites. Further research is needed to ascertain whether there are true differences in cellulitis/admission rates. Patient quality of life, experience, and preference should be included in future studies.

16 keywords...

hide…