• Bhavneet Singh, Gurkirat Singh, Amit Tripathy, Marco Larobina, John Goldblatt, and James Tatoulis.
• Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: bhavneet.singh@mh.org.au.
• J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2024 Jan 1; 167 (1): 176182176-182.

BackgroundTo maximize arterial grafts, left internal mammary (LIMA) sequential and Y grafts are used. The aim is to compare the angiographic patency of the LIMA in these configurations.MethodsBetween 2002 and 2020, angiography was performed on 1000 patients who either had a single (570), sequential (100), or LIMA y (129) graft. The LIMA was divided into segments (S); S1: LIMA inflow to the first anastomosis, S2: terminal portion of the LIMA to left anterior descending (LAD), and S3; the y-limb anastomosis to a coronary. S1 and S2 patency analysis was carried out with logistic regression.ResultsFailure of the S1 and S2 was 3.7% single, 9% sequential, and 6.2 Y graft (P = .049). Segment 1 failed in 3.7% in single, 5% in sequential, and 0.8% in Y grafts (P = .049). Segment 3 failure was 10.3%. Regression revealed female sex and sequential grafts were associated with decreased S1 and S2 patency.ConclusionsSingle grafts have the best patency. Failure in sequential grafts leads to increased occlusion of the LIMA inflow, whereas Y-graft failure tends to occlude the y limb. When arterial conduit is sparse, a Y graft should be considered.Crown Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

17 keywords...

hide…