• Yu He, Jiliang He, Fu Wang, Dongsheng Zhou, Yan Wang, Bomin Wang, and Shihong Xu.
• From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University (YH, JH, FW, DZ, BW, SX); and Department of Medical Laboratory Diagnosis Center, Jinan Central Hospital, Ji'nan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Oct 1; 94 (41): e1775.

AbstractThe purpose of this study was to use finite element analysis to compare the biomechanical characteristics after lateral locking plate (LLP) or LLP with a medial anatomical locking plate (LLP-MLP) fixation of proximal humeral fractures with an unstable medial column.First, a 3-dimensional, finite element analysis model was developed. Next, LLP and LLP-MLP implants were instrumented into the proximal humeral fracture models. Compressive and rotational loads were then applied to the humerus model to determine the biomechanical characteristics. Both normal and osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures were simulated using 2 internal fixation methods each under 7 loading conditions. To assess the biomechanical characteristics, the construct stiffness, fracture micromotion, and stress distribution on the implants were recorded and compared.The LLP-MLP method provided both lateral and medial support that reduced the stress on the LLP and the amount of displacement in the fracture region. In contrast, the LLP method resulted in more instability in the medial column and larger magnitudes of stress. In osteoporotic bone, the LLP was more inclined to fail than LLP-MLP.The LLP-MLP method provides a strong support for the medial column and increases the stability of the region surrounding the fracture.

15 keywords...

hide…