• Xiyan Zhao, Zhong Zhen, Jing Guo, Tianyu Zhao, Ru Ye, Yu Guo, Hongdong Chen, Fengmei Lian, and Xiaolin Tong.
• From the Department of Endocrinology, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guang'anmen Hospital (XZ, ZZ, JG, RY, HC, FL, XT); Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing (XZ, RY); Department of Endocrinology, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin (TZ); and Department of Endocrinology, Dongzhimen Hospital Eastern Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China (YG).
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jan 1; 95 (3): e2522.

AbstractPlacebo-controlled randomized trials are often used to evaluate the absolute effect of new treatments and are considered gold standard for clinical trials. No studies, however, have yet been conducted evaluating the reporting quality of placebo-controlled randomized trials. The current study aims to assess the reporting quality of placebo-controlled randomized trials on treatment of diabetes with Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) in Mainland China and to provide recommendations for improvements.China National Knowledge Infrastructure database, Wanfang database, China Biology Medicine database, and VIP database were searched for placebo-controlled randomized trials on treatment of diabetes with TCM. Review, animal experiment, and randomized controlled trials without placebo control were excluded. According to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 checklists items, each item was given a yes or no depending on whether it was reported or not.A total of 68 articles were included. The reporting percentage in each article ranged from 24.3% to 73%, and 30.9% articles reported more than 50% of the items. Seven of the 37 items were reported more than 90% of the items, whereas 7 items were not mentioned at all. The average reporting for "title and abstract," "introduction," "methods," "results," "discussion," and "other information" was 43.4%, 78.7%, 40.1%, 49.9%, 71.1%, and 17.2%, respectively. The percentage of each section had increased after 2010. In addition, the reporting of multiple study centers, funding, placebo species, informed consent forms, and ethical approvals were 14.7%, 50%, 36.85%, 33.8%, and 4.4%, respectively.Although a scoring system was created according to the CONSORT 2010 checklist, it was not designed as an assessment tool. According to CONSORT 2010, the reporting quality of placebo-controlled randomized trials on the treatment of diabetes with TCM improved after 2010. Future improvements, however, are still needed, particularly in methods sections.

14 keywords...

hide…