• Medicine · Feb 2017

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Impact of standardized patients on the training of medical students to manage emergencies.

    • Frank Herbstreit, Stefanie Merse, Rainer Schnell, Marcel Noack, Daniel Dirkmann, Anna Besuch, and Jürgen Peters.
    • Staff Anesthesiologist, Klinik für Anästhesiologie & Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Essen Standardized Patients Program, Student Deans office, Faculty of Medicine, Universität Duisburg-Essen Professor, Institut für Soziologie, Universität Duisburg-Essen Lecturer, Institut für Soziologie, Universität Duisburg-Essen Medical Student, Universität Duisburg-Essen Professor of Anesthesiology & Intensive Care Therapy, Universität Duisburg-Essen, and Chairman, Klinik für Anästhesiologie & Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany.
    • Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Feb 1; 96 (5): e5933.

    BackgroundTeaching emergency management should educate medical students not only for facts and treatment algorithms but also for time effective physical examination, technical skills, and team interaction. We tested the hypothesis, that using standardized emergency patients would be more effective in transmitting knowledge and skills compared with a more traditional teaching approach.MethodsMedical students (n = 242) in their fourth (second clinical) year were randomized to receive either training on standardized patients simulating 3 emergency settings ("acute chest pain," "stroke," and "acute dyspnea/asthma") or traditional small group seminars. Before and after the respective training pathways, the students' knowledge base (multiple-choice examination) and practical performance (objective structured clinical examination using 3 different emergency scenarios) were assessed.ResultsTeaching using standardized patients resulted in a significant albeit small improvement in objective structured clinical examination scores (61.2 ± 3 for the standardized patient trained group vs 60.3 ± 3.5 for the traditional seminar group; P = 0.017, maximum achievable score: 66), but no difference in the written examination scores (27.4 ± 2.4 vs 27.0 ± 4.4; P = 0.341; maximum achievable score: 30).ConclusionTeaching management of emergencies using standardized patients can improve medical students' performance in clinical tests, and a change from traditional seminars in favor of practice sessions with standardized patients does not compromise the learning of medical facts.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.