• Der Unfallchirurg · Jun 2000

    Comparative Study

    [Treatment results after primary and secondary resection of the radial head].

    • T Ambacher, F Maurer, and K Weise.
    • Chirurgische Universitätsklinik, BG-Kliniken Bergmannsheil Bochum. ThAmbacher@t-online.de
    • Unfallchirurg. 2000 Jun 1; 103 (6): 437-43.

    AbstractApart from comminuted fractures of the radial head the indication for resection of the radial head is discussed controversially. To evaluate our own results, the hospital notes of 113 patients treated between 1.1.1984-31.12.1994 in our clinic by posttraumatic primary or secondary radial head resection were examined retrospectively. 79 patients were controlled by clinical and radiological examination with an average follow-up of 37.8 months. We examined at 46 patients the influence of additional lesions of the elbow joint on the functional outcome. In 33 patients follow up was done with special regard to the time of resection. Poor results due to the score from Radian and Riseborough especially followed secondary radial head resection (> 14 days after trauma) and in case of additional elbow lesions. We could not observe problems of the wrist joint after radial head resection as described by other authors. According to our own experience primary resection is recommended in case of doubtful reconstruction of the radial head. In these fracture types radial head resection should not be seen as an alternative treatment because of the worse results following secondary resection.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…