• Leon A Simons, Michael Ortiz, S Ben Freedman, Benjamin J Waterhouse, David Colquhoun, and Gareth Thomas.
• a UNSW Lipid Research Department , St Vincent's Hospital , Darlinghurst , NSW , Australia.
• Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Nov 1; 32 (11): 1857-1861.

ObjectiveLong-term anticoagulant therapy in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) is essential to prevent thromboembolic complications, especially ischemic stroke, but treatment persistence with warfarin is poor. This study examines Australian nationwide persistence in AF patients using a non-vitamin-K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) drug.Research Design And MethodsWe assessed national Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme records November-December 2013 through March 2015 for prescription of NOAC drugs in a 10% random sample of long-term concession card holders. An historical comparison was made with patients prescribed warfarin in 2008. Key outcome measures were (i) the proportion not filling first repeat prescription and (ii) discontinuation within 12 months.ResultsA total of 1471 patients with AF were new users of a NOAC drug (228 apixaban, 645 dabigatran, 598 rivaroxaban) and 1348 were new users of warfarin. Mean age on a NOAC was 76 years (58% male), on warfarin 74 years (54% male). Only 9% (95% CI 7-10) failed to collect the first repeat prescription on a NOAC, 30% (27-32) discontinued within 12 months; corresponding proportions on warfarin were 14% (12-16) and 62% (60-65). In a regression model adjusted for age, gender, heart failure, hypertension and diabetes, warfarin-treated patients were 2.5 times more likely to discontinue over 12 months than those who were NOAC treated (hazard ratio =2.47 [95% CI 2.19-2.79]).ConclusionsPersistence with NOAC drugs in patients with AF appears to be superior to warfarin. If continued long-term, this alone will be of clinical importance in the prevention of stroke and death.

26 keywords...

hide…