• Murad Megjhani, Miriam Weiss, Soon Bin Kwon, Jenna Ford, Daniel Nametz, Nick Kastenholz, Hart Fogel, Angela Velazquez, David Roh, Sachin Agarwal, E Sander Connolly, Jan Claassen, Gerrit A Schubert, and Soojin Park.
• Department of Neurology, Columbia University, 177 Fort Washington Ave, 8 Milstein - 300 Center, New York, NY, USA.
• Neurocrit Care. 2022 Aug 1; 37 (Suppl 2): 230236230-236.

BackgroundDysfunctional cerebral autoregulation often precedes delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). Currently, there are no data-driven techniques that leverage this information to predict DCI in real time. Our hypothesis is that information using continuous updated analyses of multimodal neuromonitoring and cerebral autoregulation can be deployed to predict DCI.MethodsTime series values of intracranial pressure, brain tissue oxygenation, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), optimal CPP (CPPOpt), ΔCPP (CPP - CPPOpt), mean arterial pressure, and pressure reactivity index were combined and summarized as vectors. A validated temporal signal angle measurement was modified into a classification algorithm that incorporates hourly data. The time-varying temporal signal angle measurement (TTSAM) algorithm classifies DCI at varying time points by vectorizing and computing the angle between the test and reference time signals. The patient is classified as DCI+ if the error between the time-varying test vector and DCI+ reference vector is smaller than that between the time-varying test vector and DCI- reference vector. Finally, prediction at time point t is calculated as the majority voting over all the available signals. The leave-one-patient-out cross-validation technique was used to train and report the performance of the algorithms. The TTSAM and classifier performance was determined by balanced accuracy, F1 score, true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative over time.ResultsOne hundred thirty-one patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage who underwent multimodal neuromonitoring were identified from two centers (Columbia University: 52 [39.7%], Aachen University: 79 [60.3%]) and included in the analysis. Sixty-four (48.5%) patients had DCI, and DCI was diagnosed 7.2 ± 3.3 days after hemorrhage. The TTSAM algorithm achieved a balanced accuracy of 67.3% and an F1 score of 0.68 at 165 h (6.9 days) from bleed day with a true positive of 0.83, false positive of 0.16, true negative of 0.51, and false negative of 0.49.ConclusionsA TTSAM algorithm using multimodal neuromonitoring and cerebral autoregulation calculations shows promise to classify DCI in real time.© 2022. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society.

13 keywords...

hide…