• Tze Pin Ng, Liang Feng, Ma Shwe Zin Nyunt, Lei Feng, Mathew Niti, Boon Yeow Tan, Gribson Chan, Sue Anne Khoo, Sue Mei Chan, Philip Yap, and Keng Bee Yap.
• Gerontology Research Programme, Department of Psychological Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: pcmngtp@nus.edu.sg.
• Am. J. Med. 2015 Nov 1; 128 (11): 1225-1236.e1.

BackgroundIt is important to establish whether frailty among older individuals is reversible with nutritional, physical, or cognitive interventions, singly or in combination. We compared the effects of 6-month-duration interventions with nutritional supplementation, physical training, cognitive training, and combination treatment vs control in reducing frailty among community-dwelling prefrail and frail older persons.MethodsWe conducted a parallel group, randomized controlled trial in community-living prefrail and frail old adults in Singapore. The participants' mean age was 70.0 years, and 61.4% (n = 151) were female. Five different 6-month interventions included nutritional supplementation (n = 49), cognitive training (n = 50), physical training (n = 48), combination treatment (n = 49), and usual care control (n = 50). Frailty score, body mass index, knee extension strength, gait speed, energy/vitality, and physical activity levels and secondary outcomes (activities of daily living dependency, hospitalization, and falls) were assessed at 0 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.ResultsFrailty score and status over 12 months were reduced in all groups, including control (15%), but were significantly higher (35.6% to 47.8%) in the nutritional (odds ratio [OR] 2.98), cognition (OR 2.89), and physical (OR 4.05) and combination (OR 5.00) intervention groups. Beneficial effects were observed at 3 months and 6 months, and persisted at 12 months. Improvements in physical frailty domains (associated with interventions) were most evident for knee strength (physical, cognitive, and combination treatment), physical activity (nutritional intervention), gait speed (physical intervention), and energy (combination intervention). There were no major differences with respect to the small numbers of secondary outcomes.ConclusionsPhysical, nutritional, and cognitive interventional approaches were effective in reversing frailty among community-living older persons.Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

22 keywords...

hide…