-
J. Natl. Cancer Inst. · Dec 2013
An epidemiologic and genomic investigation into the obesity paradox in renal cell carcinoma.
- A Ari Hakimi, Helena Furberg, Emily C Zabor, Anders Jacobsen, Nikolaus Schultz, Giovanni Ciriello, Nina Mikklineni, Brandon Fiegoli, Philip H Kim, Martin H Voss, Hui Shen, Peter W Laird, Chris Sander, Victor E Reuter, Robert J Motzer, James J Hsieh, and Paul Russo.
- Affiliations of authors: Urology Service, Department of Surgery (AAH, NM, BF, PHK, PR), Human Oncology & Pathogenesis Program (AAH, JJH); Epidemiology and Biostatistics (HF, ECZ), Computational Biology (AJ, NS, GC, CS), Genitourinary Oncology (MHV, RJM, JJH), and Department of Pathology (VER), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; USC Epigenome Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California (HS, PWL); Weill Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY (RJM, JJH, PR).
- J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2013 Dec 18;105(24):1862-70.
BackgroundObesity increases risk for clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), yet obese patients appear to experience longer survival than nonobese patients. We examined body mass index (BMI) in relation to stage, grade, and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) while considering detection bias, nutritional status, and molecular tumor features.MethodsData were available from 2119 ccRCC patients who underwent renal mass surgery at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between 1995 and 2012. Logistic regression models produced associations between BMI and advanced disease. Multivariable competing risks regression models estimated associations between BMI and CSM. Somatic mutation, copy number, methylation, and expression data were examined by BMI among a subset of 126 patients who participated in the Cancer Genome Atlas Project for ccRCC using the Kruskal-Wallis or Fisher exact tests. All statistical tests were two-sided.ResultsObese and overweight patients were less likely to present with advanced-stage disease compared with normal-weight patients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.48 to 0.79 vs OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.51 to 0.83, respectively). Higher BMI was associated with reduced CSM in univariable analyses (P < .005). It remained statistically significant after adjustment for comorbidities and albumin level, but it became non-statistically significant after adjusting for stage and grade (P > .10). Genome-wide interrogation by BMI suggested differences in gene expression of metabolic and fatty acid genes, including fatty acid synthase (FASN), consistent with the obesity paradox.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that although BMI is not an independent prognostic factor for CSM after controlling for stage and grade, tumors developing in an obesogenic environment may be more indolent.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.