• Elena Müller, Julia Terstegen, Holger Kleinertz, Hanneke Weel, Karl-Heinz Frosch, Alexej Barg, and Carsten Schlickewei.
• Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland. elena_enderle@hotmail.com.
• Unfallchirurg. 2022 Apr 8.

BackgroundPosterior malleolar fractures are found in almost 50% of all ankle fractures. The high clinical relevance of these joint fractures is explained by the significantly worse clinical and functional outcome. There is still a lack of unified opinion regarding the classification and treatment of these fractures.ObjectiveThe aim of this article is to provide a systematic literature review of clinical studies that investigated posterior malleolar fractures and classified them using one of the three established classifications according to Haraguchi, Bartonicek/Rammelt, or Mason.Material And MethodsPubMed was searched without time limits. The systematic literature search was performed according to the current criteria of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The methodological quality of the included studies was quantified using the modified Coleman score.ResultsA total of 27 studies with a total of 2220 patients were included in this systematic literature review. Trimalleolar fractures showed a significantly less favorable prognosis than other ankle fractures. The quality of reduction was the most important prognostic factor for the clinical outcome.ConclusionNone of the three classifications examined has become established in the literature. Most of the classifications are weak or should not be used with respect to a derivable treatment algorithm or a prognosis with respect to the outcome. Only the classification according to Bartonicek/Rammelt is suitable to become established in the literature and in clinical practice due to its derivable treatment algorithm.© 2022. The Author(s).

4 keywords...

hide…