• S Khwaja, A V Pahade, D Luff, M W Green, and K M J Green.
• Department of Otolaryngology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, United Kingdom. sadiekhwaja@hotmail.com
• Rhinology. 2007 Mar 1;45(1):83-8.

ObjectiveTo investigate the outcomes from nasal fracture reduction performed under local anaesthesia (LA) and general anaesthesia (GA).MethodA randomised multi-centred prospective trial and cohort analysis. Patients were randomised into two groups, 74 (53%) underwent closed reduction under LA, 65 (47%) patients underwent closed reduction under GA.Main Outcome MeasuresPain scores and patient toleration of local or general nasal manipulation was noted.ResultsThe pain score ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain). The mean pain score in the LA group was 3, compared to 2 in the GA group. LA manipulation was tolerated equally well as GA manipulation by 85% of the patients in each group. The number of patients requiring a septorhinoplasty was compared between LA 19/74 (26%), and GA 21/65 (32%). This failed to demonstrate a significant difference with a p value of 0.50. The absolute risk difference was 5% with a 95% confidence interval of (20% to -10%).ConclusionThis trial clearly shows LA to be as effective as GA in the first line management of nasal fractures. The degree of septal displacement and presence of nasal tip deviation were associated with persistent nasal deformity following nasal fracture reduction.

35 keywords...

hide…