• Bmc Fam Pract · Jun 2018

    General practitioners' perspectives on management of early-stage chronic kidney disease: a focus group study.

    • Carola van Dipten, Saskia van Berkel, Wim J C de Grauw, Nynke D Scherpbier-de Haan, Bouke Brongers, Karel van Spaendonck, WetzelsJack F MJFMDepartment of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Postal Route 464, Nijmegen, The Netherlands., AssendelftWillem J JWJJDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Postal Route 117, Nijmegen, The Netherlands., and Marianne K Dees.
    • Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Postal Route 117, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Carola.vanDipten@radboudumc.nl.
    • Bmc Fam Pract. 2018 Jun 6; 19 (1): 81.

    BackgroundGuideline adherence in chronic kidney disease management is low, despite guideline implementation initiatives. Knowing general practitioners' (GPs') perspectives of management of early-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) and the applicability of the national interdisciplinary guideline could support strategies to improve quality of care.MethodQualitative focus group study with 27 GPs in the Netherlands. Three analysts open-coded and comparatively analysed the data. Mind-mapping sessions were performed after data-saturation.ResultsFive themes emerged: defining CKD, knowledge and awareness, patient-physician interaction, organisation of CKD care and value of the guideline. A key finding was the abstractness of the CKD concept. The GPs expressed various perspectives about defining CKD and interpreting estimated glomerular filtration rates. Views about clinical relevance influenced the decision-making, although factual knowledge seems lacking. Striving to inform well enough without creating anxiety and to explain suitably for the intellectual ability of the patient caused tension in the patient-physician interaction. Integration with cardiovascular disease-management programmes was mentioned as a way of implementing CKD care in the future. The guideline was perceived as a rough guide rather than a leading document.ConclusionCKD is perceived as an abstract rather than a clinical concept. Abstractness plays a role in all formulated themes. Management of CKD patients in primary care is complex and is influenced by physician-bound considerations related to individual knowledge and perception of the importance of CKD. Strategies are needed to improve GPs' understanding of the concept of CKD by education, a holistic approach to guidelines, and integration of CKD care into cardiovascular programmes.Trial RegistrationNot applicable.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…