• Chest · Sep 2022

    The Association of Healthcare System Resources with Lung Cancer Screening Implementation: A Cohort Study.

    • Jennifer A Lewis, Lauren R Samuels, Jason Denton, Michael E Matheny, Amelia Maiga, Christopher G Slatore, Eric Grogan, Jane Kim, Robert H Sherrier, Robert S Dittus, Pierre P Massion, Laura Keohane, Christianne L Roumie, and Sayeh Nikpay.
    • Veterans Health Administration-Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Medicine Service, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Nashville, TN; Veterans Health Administration - Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Medicine Service, Nashville, TN; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. Electronic address: jennifer.a.lewis@vumc.org.
    • Chest. 2022 Sep 1; 162 (3): 701711701-711.

    BackgroundThe Veterans Health Administration issued policy for lung cancer screening resources at eight Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) in a demonstration project (DP) from 2013 through 2015.Research QuestionDo policies that provide resources increase lung cancer screening rates?Study Design And MethodsData from eight DP VAMCs (DP group) and 20 comparable VAMCs (comparison group) were divided into before DP (January 2011-June 2013), DP (July 2013-June 2015), and after DP (July 2015-December 2018) periods. Coprimary outcomes were unique veterans screened per 1,000 eligible per month and those with 1-year (9-15 months) follow-up screening. Eligible veterans were estimated using yearly counts and the percentage of those with eligible smoking histories. Controlled interrupted time series and difference-in-differences analyses were performed.ResultsOf 27,746 veterans screened, the median age was 66.5 years and most were White (77.7%), male (95.6%), and urban dwelling (67.3%). During the DP, the average rate of unique veterans screened at DP VAMCs was 17.7 per 1,000 eligible per month, compared with 0.3 at comparison VAMCs. Adjusted analyses found a higher rate increase at DP VAMCs by 0.93 screening per 1,000 eligible per month (95% CI, 0.25-1.61) during this time, with an average facility-level difference of 17.4 screenings per 1,000 eligible per month (95% CI, 12.6-22.3). Veterans with 1-year follow-up screening also increased more rapidly at DP VAMCs during the DP, by 0.39 screening per 1,000 eligible per month (95% CI, 0.18-0.60), for an average facility-level difference of 7.2 more screenings per 1,000 eligible per month (95% CI, 5.2-9.2). Gains were not maintained after the DP.InterpretationIn this cohort, provision of resources for lung cancer screening implementation was associated with an increase in veterans screened and those with 1-year follow-up screening. Screening gains associated with the DP were not maintained.Published by Elsevier Inc.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…