• Annals of medicine · Aug 2016

    Is monocyte to HDL ratio superior to monocyte count in predicting the cardiovascular outcomes: evidence from a large cohort of Chinese patients undergoing coronary angiography.

    • Yan Zhang, Sha Li, Yuan-Lin Guo, Na-Qiong Wu, Cheng-Gang Zhu, Ying Gao, Rui-Xia Xu, Qian Dong, Geng Liu, Jing Sun, and Jian-Jun Li.
    • a Division of Dyslipidemia, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease , FuWai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College , Beijing , China.
    • Ann. Med. 2016 Aug 1; 48 (5): 305-12.

    AimRecently, monocyte-to-high density lipoprotein ratio (MHR) has been proposed as a novel prognostic indicator of cardiovascular diseases. However, no study is currently available regarding the comparison between MHR and monocyte count (MC) in predicting the outcomes among patients undergoing coronary angiography.MethodsA total of 3798 patients scheduled for selective coronary angiography were enrolled and followed up to capture major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs, death, acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke, heart failure, and unexpected coronary revascularization). Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the risk of MHR or MC on MACEs.ResultsDuring a median of 24.6 months follow-up, 347 (9.1%) MACEs occurred. The upper tertiles of MC and MHR have a significant lower event-free survival (p = 0.011; p = 0.014, respectively). Significantly, both MC and MHR were associated with increased MACEs risk after adjusting for potential confounders [adjusted HR (95% CI): 2.734 (1.547-4.832); 2.031 (1.268-3.254), respectively]. Additionally, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves of MC or MHR in predicting MACEs were 0.574 (0.542-0.606) and 0.562 (0.530-0.594) (p < 0.001, both), respectively.ConclusionsOur data firstly indicated that MHR was an independent predictor of MACEs whereas the prognostic impact was not superior to MC in patients who underwent coronary angiography. Key Messages MHR has been suggested as a novel prognostic indicator of several cardiovascular diseases. No study is currently available regarding the comparison of MHR to MC in predicting the outcomes in a large cohort of patients undergoing coronary angiography. Our data firstly indicate that MHR is independently associated with MACEs in patients undergoing coronary angiography whereas the prognostic impact is similar to MC.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.