• J Formos Med Assoc · Oct 2002

    Comparative Study

    Colorectal cancer screening in asymptomaic adults: comparison of colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and fecal occult blood tests.

    • Tsun-I Cheng, Jau-Min Wong, Cheng-Fang Hong, Skye H Cheng, Tsun-Jen Cheng, Ming-Jium Shieh, Yue-Mong Lin, C Y Tso, and Andrew T Huang.
    • Department of Medicine, Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
    • J Formos Med Assoc. 2002 Oct 1; 101 (10): 685-90.

    Background And PurposeFecal occult blood tests (FOBT) and flexible sigmoidoscopy have previously been recommended for colon cancer screening. More recently, studies have recommended colonoscopy due to the high rates of advanced neoplasm not detected by FOBT and sigmoidoscopy. Previous studies of the effectiveness of colonoscopic screening in Taiwan were limited to families of patients with colorectal cancer. This study compared colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and FOBT for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic adults.MethodsScreening colonoscopies and FOBT were performed in asymptomatic adults enrolled in our health-screening program between January 1997 and December 2000. Advanced neoplasm was defined as the presence of a polyp larger than 1 cm, polyps with villous or severe dysplastic features, or cancer. The junction of the splenic flexure and descending colon was defined as the boundary of the proximal and distal colon, and it was presumed that the distal colon would be examined using sigmoidoscopy in all patients. Data on the prevalence of polyps, advanced neoplasm, and cancer among different age groups were obtained. The results of chemical and immunologic FOBT were compared. The anatomic distributions of advanced neoplasm and cancer were analyzed.ResultsA total of 7,411 colonoscopic examinations were included in the analysis. Advanced neoplasms were present in 93 examinations (1.3%), including 16 cancers (0.2%). Chemical FOBT detected 20.2% of advanced neoplasms and 37.5% of cancers. Immunologic FOBT detected 48.3% of advanced neoplasms and 87.5% of cancers. If sigmoidoscopy had been performed in place of colonoscopy, 26.9% of advanced neoplasms and 12.5% of cancers would not have been detected.ConclusionsColonoscopy can detect neoplastic lesions undetectable by FOBT and sigmoidoscopy in asymptomatic subjects. These results suggest that colonoscopy should be the method of choice in colon cancer screening.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…