-
Annals of Saudi medicine · Mar 2022
Intracoronary epinephrine versus adenosine in the management of refractory no-reflow phenomenon: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
- Ahmed Darwish, Abdel-Fattah Frere, Magdy Abdelsamie, Waleed El Awady, and Mohammad Gouda.
- From the Department of Cardiology, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
- Ann Saudi Med. 2022 Mar 1; 42 (2): 75-82.
BackgroundThe no-reflow phenomenon is associated with a considerable reduction in myocardial salvage in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated by primary percutaneous intervention (PCI). There has been no head-to-head comparison of intra-coronary epinephrine to adenosine in the management of no-reflow phenomenon.ObjectivesEvaluate the short- and long-term efficacy and safety of using intracoronary epinephrine versus adenosine for management of the catastrophic no-reflow phenomenon that may occur during primary PCI.DesignRetrospective cohort.SettingSingle center in Egypt.Patients And MethodsThe study included STEMI patients who developed refractory no-reflow phenomenon during primary PCI after failure of conventional treatments and received either intracoronary epinephrine or adenosine.Main Outcome MeasuresNo-reflow management measured through improvement of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction grade (TIMI flow), myocardial blush grade, TIMI frame count and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 1-year follow up.Sample Size156 patients with refractory no-reflow phenomenon during primary PCI.ResultsSuccessful reperfusion was achieved in 74 of 81 (91.4%) of patients who received epinephrine and in 65 of 75 (86.7%) who received adenosine (P<.05). Fifty-six of 81 patients (69.1%) achieved TIMI III flow after epinephrine administration versus 39 of 75 patients (52.7%) in the adenosine group (P=.04). The incidence of heart failure after 1 year of follow up was lower in the epinephrine group compared to the adenosine group (6.3% vs. 19.2%, P<.017). MACE after 1 year of follow up was lower in patients who received epinephrine compared to those who received adenosine (11.3 % Vs. 26.7 %, P<.01).ConclusionDuring primary PCI, intracoronary epinephrine is as effective as adenosine in successful management of refractory no-reflow phenomenon with a more favorable long-term prognosis compared to adenosine.LimitationsRetrospective design.Conflict Of InterestNone.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.