• Adeola Bamgboje-Ayodele, Sandra Avery, Joanne Pearson, May Mak, Kylie Smith, Orlando Rincones, Shalini Vinod, Victoria Bray, Ivana Ducinoska, Karina McCarthy, Kimberley Williamson, Geoff P Delaney, PROMPT-Care Implementation Authorship Group, and Afaf Girgis.
• UNSW Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
• J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Dec 1; 28 (6): 107210831072-1083.

Rationale, Aims And ObjectiveDetails of the development and implementation of integrated care pathways (ICPs) in the context of electronic collection of patient reported outcomes (ePROs) for cancer patients are largely lacking in the literature. This study describes what, why and how decisions were made to adapt and implement an ePROs ICP for patients with lung cancer.MethodsA consensus process was utilized, with the implementation advisory group including multidisciplinary representation from three participating hospitals, to identify local champions and adapt and incorporate the ePRO ICP into the local contexts. Engagement meetings were documented via meeting transcripts, and detailed notes from October 2019 to November 2020 were content-analysed to identify decision-making themes based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research; workflows and process maps were reviewed and modified to integrate ePROs.ResultsIn total, 55 engagement activities were held (24 meetings, 20 workshops 11 educational sessions), with n = 96 staff from multiple disciplines participating in the ePROs implementation through advisory meetings, process mapping, change management and staff education. Decisions were made regarding eligible patient cohorts to include, the process for onboarding patients onto the ePRO system, and follow-up and referral pathways. Rationales for decisions included alignment with existing workflows, utilizing available staff, minimizing staff and patient burden and maximizing patient engagement.ConclusionExisting resources, staff input and technical and logistical reasons often guided the ICP decisions, highlighting the need for in-depth engagement across all stakeholders for optimal implementation of ePRO ICPs. The ePRO implementation required substantial dialogue and systematic resolution to reach agreement on the final processes. Adapting the local ICP through rigorous engagement facilitated the successful implementation of ePROs as business-as-usual at all three cancer centres. Involving all relevant stakeholders is critical to the successful adaptation of ICPs before their introduction into routine care.© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

14 keywords...

hide…