• Bart Witjes, Lucas A Ottenheym, HuygenFrank J P MFJPMDepartment of Anesthesiology, Center for Pain Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands., and Cecile C de Vos.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Center for Pain Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: b.witjes.1@erasmusmc.nl.
• Neuromodulation. 2023 Jan 1; 26 (1): 354235-42.

BackgroundSpinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective therapy for patients with refractory chronic pain syndromes. Although studies have shown that SCS has both spinal and supraspinal effects, the current understanding of cortical effects is still limited. Neuroimaging techniques, such as magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG), combined here as M/EEG, can reveal modulations in ongoing resting-state cortical activity. We aim to provide an overview of available literature on resting-state M/EEG in patients with chronic pain who have been treated with SCS.Materials And MethodsWe searched multiple online data bases for studies on SCS, chronic pain, and resting-state M/EEG. Primary outcome measures were changes in spectral features, combined with brain regions in which these changes occurred.ResultsWe included eight studies reporting various SCS paradigms (tonic, burst, high-dose, and high-frequency stimulation) and revealing heterogeneity in outcome parameters. We summarized changes in cortical activity in various frequency bands: theta (4-7 Hz), alpha (7-12 Hz), beta (13-30 Hz), and gamma (30-44 Hz). In multiple studies, the somatosensory cortex showed modulation of cortical activity under tonic, burst, and high-frequency stimulation. Changes in connectivity were found in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and parahippocampus.ConclusionsThe large heterogeneity observed in outcome measures is probably caused by the large variety in study designs, stimulation paradigms, and spectral features studied. Paresthesia-free paradigms have been compared with tonic stimulation in multiple studies. These studies suggest modulation of medial, lateral, and descending pathways for paresthesia-free stimulation, whereas tonic stimulation predominantly modulates lateral and descending pathways. Moreover, multiple studies have reported an increased alpha peak frequency, increased alpha power, and/or decreased theta power when SCS was compared with baseline, indicating modulation of thalamocortical pathways. Further studies with well-defined groups of responders and nonresponders to SCS are recommended to independently study the cortical effects of pain relief and SCS.Copyright © 2022 International Neuromodulation Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

16 keywords...

hide…