• Eur. J. Intern. Med. · Aug 2022

    Developing a simple and practical decision model to predict the risk of incident type 2 diabetes among the general population: The Di@bet.es Study.

    • Sergio Martínez-Hervás, María M Morales-Suarez-Varela, Irene Andrés-Blasco, Francisco Lara-Hernández, Isabel Peraita-Costa, José T Real, Ana-Bárbara García-García, and F Javier Chaves.
    • Department of Medicine, University of Valencia, Avenida Blasco Ibañez 15, Valencia 46010, Spain; Service of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Valencia University Clinical Hospital, Avenida Blasco Ibañez 17, Valencia 46010, Spain; INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Menendez Pelayo 4acc, Valencia 46010, Spain; CIBER of Diabetes and Associated Metabolic Diseases CIBERDEM, Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Madrid 28029, Spain.
    • Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2022 Aug 1; 102: 80-87.

    AimsTo develop a simple multivariate predictor model of incident type 2 diabetes in general population.MethodsParticipants were recruited from the Spanish Di@bet.es cohort study with 2570 subjects meeting all criteria to be included in the at-risk sample studied here. Information was collected using an interviewer-administered structured questionnaire, followed by physical and clinical examination. CHAID algorithm, which collects the information of individuals with and without type 2 diabetes, was used to develop a decision tree based type 2 diabetes prediction model.Results156 individuals were identified as having developed type 2 diabetes (6.5% incidence). Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) at the beginning of the study was the main predictive variable for incident type 2 diabetes: FPG ≤ 92 mg/dL (ref.), 92-106 mg/dL (OR = 3.76, 95%CI = 2.36-6.00), > 106 mg/dL (OR = 13.21; 8.26-21.12). More than 25% of subjects starting follow-up with FPG levels > 106 mg/dL developed type 2 diabetes. When FPG <106 mg/dL, other variables (fasting triglycerides (FTGs), BMI or age) were needed. For levels ≤ 92 mg/dL, higher FTGs levels increased risk of incident type 2 diabetes (FTGs > 180 mg/dL, OR = 14.57; 4.89-43.40) compared with the group of FTGs ≤ 97 mg/dL (FTGs  = 97-180 mg/dL, OR = 3.12; 1.05-9.24). This model correctly classified 93.5% of individuals.ConclusionsThe type 2 diabetes prediction model is based on FTGs, FPG, age, gender, and BMI values. Utilizing commonly available clinical data and a simple blood test, a simple tree diagram helps identify subjects at risk of developing type 2 diabetes, even in apparently low risk subjects with normal FPG.Copyright © 2022 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.