-
- Jade Merrer, Anne A Chantry, Béatrice Blondel, Camille Le Ray, and Marie-Pierre Bonnet.
- From the Université de Paris, Centre of Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS/CRESS/Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), INSERM, INRA (JM, AAC, BB, ClR, M-PB), Midwifery school of Baudelocque, AP-HP, Université de Paris (AAC), Port-Royal Maternity Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Cochin Broca Hôtel-Dieu hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (ClR) and Sorbonne University, GRC 29, DMU DREAM, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Armand Trousseau Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France (M-PB).
- Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2022 Jun 1; 39 (6): 489497489-497.
BackgroundDisparities in access to pain management have been identified in several care settings, such as emergency departments and intensive care units, but with regard to labour analgesia, it remains poorly explored.ObjectivesTo determine the proportion of women without pain management during labour and its individual and organisational determinants.DesignSecondary analysis of a nationwide cross-sectional population-based study, the 2016 French National Perinatal Survey.SettingsAll maternity units in France.ParticipantsTen thousand and eleven women who attempted vaginal delivery with a labour duration at least 15 min.Main Outcome MeasureAbsence of pain management, defined as absence of any pharmacological or nonpharmacological analgesic method during labour.ResultsAmong the 10 011 women included, 542 (5.4%) had no labour pain management: 318 (3.7%) of the 8526 women who initially preferred to use neuraxial analgesia and 222 (15.8%) of the 1402 who did not. Using generalised estimating equations stratified according to the maternal antenatal preference for neuraxial analgesia, the common determinants of no labour pain management in both groups were no attendance at childbirth education classes and admission to a delivery unit during the night. Among women who initially preferred to use neuraxial analgesia, those who delivered in units with <1500 annual deliveries compared with units with 2000 to 3499 annual deliveries, were more likely to do without pain management [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.39 to 2.78]; among those who did not prefer to use it, women born abroad were more likely to do without labour pain management (adjusted OR = 1.64; 95% CI, 1.12 to 2.40).ConclusionIn France, 1 : 20 women had no labour pain management, and this proportion was three times higher among women who preferred not to use neuraxial analgesia. Enhancing maternal information on labour pain and its management, especially nonpharmacological methods, and rethinking care organisation, could improve access to analgesia of any kind.Copyright © 2022 European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.