-
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. · Aug 2022
Characterising ALS disease progression according to El Escorial and Gold Coast criteria.
- Adriaan D de Jongh, Nathalie Braun, Markus Weber, Michael A van Es, Pegah Masrori, Jan H Veldink, Philip van Damme, Leonard H van den Berg, and van EijkRuben P ARPA0000-0002-7132-5967Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, Utrecht, The Netherlands R.P.A.vanEijk-2@umcutrecht.nl.Biostatistics & Research Support, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Pr.
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. 2022 Aug 1; 93 (8): 865870865-870.
BackgroundThe Gold Coast criteria (GCC) have been proposed as a means of selecting patients for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) clinical trials. We aimed to characterise disease progression according to the GCC.MethodsData from population-based ALS registries from the Netherlands and Belgium were analysed. The GCC additionally define ALS as lower motor neuron (LMN) dysfunction in ≥2 body regions without upper motor neuron dysfunction. Therefore, the revised El Escorial criteria (rEEC) were supplemented with a 'Gold Coast ALS' category for patients with only LMN dysfunction in ≥2 body regions. We assessed survival time, ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) progression rates and between-patient variability per diagnostic category.ResultsWe included 5957 ALS patients, of whom 600 (10.1%) fulfilled the GCC but not the rEEC, and 95 (1.6%) fulfilled only the rEEC. ALSFRS-R progression rates were similar for the rEEC (0.84 points/month) and GCC (0.81 points/month) with similar variability (standard deviation of 0.59 vs. 0.60) and median survival time (17.8 vs.18.7 months). Survival time and average progression rates varied (p<0.001) between categories. Per category, however, there was considerable between-patient variability with progression rates ranging from: -2.10 to -0.14 (definite), -1.94 to -0.06 (probable), -2.10 to -0.02 (probable laboratory supported), -1.79 to -0.02 (possible) and -1.31 to 0.08 (Gold Coast).ConclusionsThe GCC broaden the definition of ALS, allowing more patients to participate in trials, while minimally impacting population heterogeneity. Given the large variability per diagnostic category, selecting only specific categories for trials may not result in a more homogeneous study population.© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.