• Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. · Dec 1986

    Comparative Study

    Neonatal advantage of epidural anesthesia in elective and emergency cesarean sections: a report of 531 cases.

    • R Gale, P E Slater, and I Zalkinder-Luboshitz.
    • Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 1986 Dec 1;23(5-6):369-77.

    AbstractIn 147 elective and 384 non-elective cesarean sections, the need for neonatal respiratory assistance at birth was significantly greater for babies born under general anesthesia compared to epidural anesthesia, and the differences could not be explained by differences in pre-operative risk factors. For 114 babies on whom blood gas data were gathered prospectively, a greater proportion born under general anesthesia were acidemic and hypercarbic. Our results complement a growing body of retrospective and clinical data suggesting that epidural anesthesia is preferable to general in all but a few cesarean sections. Ideally, this suggestion should be tested in a randomized clinical trial.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…