-
- RaiSurvendra Kumar RSKRFrom the Department of Neurosurgery, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College, Mumbai, India. Electronic address: rskrrai@gmail.com., Nikhil Kumar S Gajbhiye, Amit Mahore, Saswat Kumar Dandpat, Kushal Bhatia, Tejas P Vaja, Varun V Bafna, and Dattatraya Muzumdar.
- From the Department of Neurosurgery, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College, Mumbai, India. Electronic address: rskrrai@gmail.com.
- World Neurosurg. 2022 Aug 1; 164: 388-392.
BackgroundManipulation of the temporalis muscle during pterional and frontotemporal approaches poses major cosmetic and functional issues postoperatively. The temporalis muscle has usually been secured in its normal position using implants or by leaving a thin rim of muscle and fascia attached along the superior temporal line. In the present report, we have described a pure tissue-based method of anchoring the intact temporalis muscle precisely along the superior temporal line.MethodsA total of 30 consecutive cases of pterional or frontotemporal craniotomy were performed by single surgeon (SKR). A subfascial dissection technique was used to expose the transition zone of the frontal pericranium with the temporalis fascia. These were then separated by sharp dissection along the superior temporal line at which the muscle is attached. The temporalis muscle and fascia were repositioned during closure, precisely at their original anatomical location by passing multiple anchoring sutures along the free edge of the muscle and fascia lying along the superior temporal line.ResultsTemporalis muscle reattachment was achieved in all 30 cases with good cosmesis and functional outcome without temporalis muscle-related complications at 6 months of follow-up.ConclusionsThe approximation of sutures running through the free edge of the temporalis muscle with intact fascia along the superior temporal line from anteriorly to posteriorly restored the muscle and fascial layer to its original position. Avoidance of the formation of any potential dead space during surgical exposure will prevent periorbital edema and/or subgaleal collection postoperatively. The described inexpensive technique avoids implant-related complications, with good functional and aesthetic outcomes. A comparative study is needed to establish the superiority of this procedure over other techniques.Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.