• Zhang Shu, Song Chen, Wei Wang, Yufa Qiu, Ying Yu, Nan Lyu, and Chi Wang.
• Department of Neurosurgery, The First People's Hospital of Taicang, Taicang, China.
• World Neurosurg. 2022 Sep 1; 165: e137e147e137-e147.

ObjectiveSeveral machine learning algorithms have been increasingly applied to predict the rupture risk of intracranial aneurysms. We performed the present diagnostic meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the diagnostic value of machine learning algorithms for assessing the rupture risk of intracranial aneurysms.MethodsWe systematically searched 3 electronic databases, including Medline (via PubMed), the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (via Ovid), and Embase (via Elsevier), to retrieve eligible studies from the databases' inception through March 2021. The latest update was performed in June 2021. StataMP, version 14, was used to estimate all pooled diagnostic values.ResultsA total of 4 studies involving 6 reports were considered to meet the inclusion criteria. Our diagnostic meta-analysis generated the following pooled diagnostic values: sensitivity, 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.90); specificity, 0.78 (95% CI, 0.68-0.85); positive likelihood ratio, 3.8 (95% CI, 2.4-5.9); negative likelihood ratio, 0.21 (95% CI, 0.12-0.35), diagnostic odd ratio, 18 (95% CI, 7-46), and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.90).ConclusionsOur findings have demonstrated that the diagnostic performance of machine learning algorithms for the rupture risk assessment of AIs is excellent. Considering that the negative effects resulted from the limited number of eligible studies, we suggest developing more well-designed studies with larger sample sizes to validate our findings.Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

11 keywords...

hide…