-
- Manami Takahashi, Hiroyuki Takaoka, Joji Ota, Satomi Yashima, Makiko Kinoshita, Noriko Suzuki-Eguchi, Haruka Sasaki, Hiroki Goto, Shuhei Aoki, Hideki Kitahara, Koichi Sano, and Yoshio Kobayashi.
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
- Intern. Med. 2023 Jan 15; 62 (2): 169176169-176.
AbstractObjective High-quality images can be obtained with 320-slice computed tomography (CT) with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR). We therefore investigated the diagnostic accuracy of 320-slice CT with MBIR for detecting significant coronary artery stenosis. Methods This was a retrospective study of 160 patients who underwent coronary CT and invasive coronary angiography (ICA). The first 100 consecutive patients (Group 1) underwent 320-slice CT without MBIR or small-focus scanning. The next 60 consecutive patients (Group 2) underwent 320-slice CT with both MBIR and small-focus scanning. Patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery were excluded. The diagnostic performance of 320-slice CT without MBIR or small-focus scanning and 320-slice CT with both of them, with ICA regarded as a reference standard, was compared to detect significant coronary artery stenosis (≥70% on CT, ≥75% on ICA). Results In a patient-based analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of detection of significant stenosis on CT against ICA were 95%, 85%, and 91% in Group 1, and 93%, 83%, and 90% in Group 2, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the patient- and segment-based analyses. However, among cases with a severe coronary artery calcium score >400 (31 cases in Group 1 and 28 in Group 2), the specificity and overall accuracy were significantly higher (all p<0.01) in Group 2 than in Group 1 according to the segment-based analysis. Conclusion The diagnostic accuracy of the detection of coronary artery stenosis on CT was improved using 320-slice CT with MBIR.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.