• Journal of critical care · Oct 2022

    Monitoring and auditing protocol adherence, data integrity and ethical conduct of a randomized clinical trial: A case study.

    • Alyson Takaoka, Nicole Zytaruk, Megan Davis, Andrea Matte, Jennie Johnstone, François Lauzier, John Marshall, Neill Adhikari, France J Clarke, Bram Rochwerg, François Lamontagne, Lori Hand, Irene Watpool, Rebecca K Porteous, Marie-Hélène Masse, Frédérick D'Aragon, Daniel Niven, Diane Heels-Ansdell, Erick Duan, Joanna Dionne, Shane English, Charles St-Arnaud, Tina Millen, Deborah J Cook, and PROSPECT Investigators and the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group.
    • Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: takaokam@mcmaster.ca.
    • J Crit Care. 2022 Oct 1; 71: 154094.

    PurposeTo categorize, quantify and interpret findings documented in feedback letters of monitoring or auditing visits for an investigator-initiated, peer-review funded multicenter randomized trial testing probiotics for critically ill patients.Materials & MethodsIn 37 Canadian centers, monitoring and auditing visits were performed by 3 trained individuals; findings were reported in feedback letters. At trial termination, we performed duplicate content analysis on letters, categorizing observations first into unique findings, followed by 10 pre-determined trial quality management domains. We further classified each observation into a) missing operational records, b) errors in process, and potential threats to c) data integrity, d) patient privacy or e) safety.ResultsAcross 37 monitoring or auditing visits, 75 unique findings were categorized into 10 domains. Most frequently, observations were in domains of training documentation (180/566 [32%]) and the informed consent process (133/566 [23%]). Most observations were missing operational records (438/566 [77%]) rather than errors in process (128/566 [23%]). Of 75 findings, 13 (62/566 observations [11%]) posed a potential threat to data integrity, 1 (1/566 observation [0.18%]) to patient privacy, and 9 (49/566 observations [8.7%]) to patient safety.ConclusionsMonitoring and auditing findings predominantly concerned missing documentation with minimal threats to data integrity, patient privacy or safety.Trial RegistrationPROSPECT (Probiotics: Prevention of Severe Pneumonia and Endotracheal Colonization Trial): NCT02462590.Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.