• Taeko Minegishi, Melissa M Garrido, Eleanor T Lewis, Elizabeth M Oliva, Steven D Pizer, Kiersten L Strombotne, Jodie A Trafton, Kertu Tenso, Pooja S Sohoni, and Austin B Frakt.
• Partnered Evidence-Based Policy Research Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02130, USA. taeko.minegishi@va.gov.
• J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Nov 1; 37 (14): 374637503746-3750.

BackgroundThe Veterans Health Administration (VHA) developed a dashboard Stratification Tool for Opioid Risk Mitigation (STROM) to guide clinical practice interventions. VHA released a policy mandating that high-risk patients of an adverse event based on the STORM dashboard are to be reviewed by an interdisciplinary team of clinicians.AimRandomized program evaluation to evaluate if patients in the oversight arm had a lower risk of opioid-related serious adverse events (SAEs) or death compared to those in the non-oversight arm.Setting And ParticipantsOne-hundred and forty VHA facilities (aka medical centers) were randomly assigned to two groups: oversight and non-oversight arms. VHA patients who were prescribed opioids between April 18, 2018, and November 8, 2019, were included in the cohort.Program DescriptionWe hypothesized that patients cared for by VHA facilities that received the policy with the oversight accountability language would achieve lower opioid-related SAEs or death.Program EvaluationWe did not observe a relationship between the oversight arm and opioid-related SAEs or death. Patients in the non-oversight arm had a significantly higher chance of receiving a case review compared to those in the oversight arm.DiscussionEven though our findings were unexpected, the STORM policy overall was likely successful in focusing the provider's attention on very high-risk patients.© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine.

15 keywords...

hide…