• Daniel Deuter, Elisabeth Torka, Zacharias Kohl, Nils-Ole Schmidt, and Juergen Schlaier.
• Department of Neurosurgery, University of Regensburg Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany; Center for Deep Brain Stimulation, University of Regensburg Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany. Electronic address: daniel.deuter@klinik.uni-regensburg.de.
• Neuromodulation. 2023 Dec 1; 26 (8): 166816791668-1679.

ObjectivesThe dentato-rubro-thalamic tract (DRTT) has been found to play a major role in the mechanisms of tremor alleviation by deep brain stimulation (DBS) in essential tremor (ET). Still, the influence of the two different parts of the DRTT, consisting of crossing and nondecussating fibers, is not yet clear with respect to tremor reduction. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of the crossing and the nondecussating part of the DRTT on tremor control in ET.Materials And MethodsWe investigated 80 electrode contacts in ten patients with ET who received bilateral DBS of the Nucleus ventralis intermedius of the thalamus (VIM). Preoperatively and with patients under general anesthesia, 3T magnetic resonance imaging scans were performed, including Diffusion Tensor Imaging scans with 64 gradient directions. We calculated the course of the two parts of the DRTT based on a workflow for probabilistic fiber tracking including protocols for correction of susceptibility- and eddy current-induced distortions. Distances of electrode contacts were correlated with clinical data from neurologic single pole testing.ResultsVoltage- and current-steered systems were analyzed separately. Regarding postural tremor, effective contacts showed significantly lower distances to both parts of the DRTT (crossing p < 0.001, nondecussating p < 0.05) in voltage-steered systems. Regarding intentional tremor, significant results were only found for the crossing part (p < 0.01). Regarding both tremor types, effective contacts were closer to the crossing part, unlike less effective contacts. Nonlinear regression analyses using a logistic model showed higher coefficients for the crossing part of the DRTT. Multivariate regression models including distances to both parts of the DRTT showed a significant influence of only the crossing part. Analysis of current-steered systems showed unstable data, probably because of the small number of analyzed patients.ConclusionsOur data suggest an involvement of both parts of the DRTT in tremor reduction, indicating mediation of DBS effects by both fiber bundles, although the crossing part showed stronger correlations with good clinical responses. Nevertheless, special attention should be paid to methodologic aspects when using probabilistic tractography for patient-specific targeting to avoid uncertain and inaccurate results.Copyright © 2022 International Neuromodulation Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

18 keywords...

hide…