-
Randomized Controlled Trial
The PROMIZING trial enrollment algorithm for early identification of patients ready for unassisted breathing.
- Clement Brault, Jordi Mancebo, Juan-Carlos Suarez Montero, Tracey Bentall, BurnsKaren E AKEAInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.Unity Health Toronto - St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.Applied Health Research Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada., Thomas Piraino, François Lellouche, Pierre-Alexandre Bouchard, Emmanuel Charbonney, Guillaume Carteaux, Tommaso Maraffi, Gaëtan Beduneau, Alain Mercat, Yoanna Skrobik, Fei Zuo, Myriam Lafreniere-Roula, Kevin Thorpe, Laurent Brochard, and Karen J Bosma.
- Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, 209 Victoria St, Toronto, ON, Canada. Clement.brault@unityhealth.to.
- Crit Care. 2022 Jun 23; 26 (1): 188.
BackgroundLiberating patients from mechanical ventilation (MV) requires a systematic approach. In the context of a clinical trial, we developed a simple algorithm to identify patients who tolerate assisted ventilation but still require ongoing MV to be randomized. We report on the use of this algorithm to screen potential trial participants for enrollment and subsequent randomization in the Proportional Assist Ventilation for Minimizing the Duration of MV (PROMIZING) study.MethodsThe algorithm included five steps: enrollment criteria, pressure support ventilation (PSV) tolerance trial, weaning criteria, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) tolerance trial (0 cmH2O during 2 min) and spontaneous breathing trial (SBT): on fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) 40% for 30-120 min. Patients who failed the weaning criteria, CPAP Zero trial, or SBT were randomized. We describe the characteristics of patients who were initially enrolled, but passed all steps in the algorithm and consequently were not randomized.ResultsAmong the 374 enrolled patients, 93 (25%) patients passed all five steps. At time of enrollment, most patients were on PSV (87%) with a mean (± standard deviation) FiO2 of 34 (± 6) %, PSV of 8.7 (± 2.9) cmH2O, and positive end-expiratory pressure of 6.1 (± 1.6) cmH2O. Minute ventilation was 9.0 (± 3.1) L/min with a respiratory rate of 17.4 (± 4.4) breaths/min. Patients were liberated from MV with a median [interquartile range] delay between initial screening and extubation of 5 [1-49] hours. Only 7 (8%) patients required reintubation.ConclusionThe trial algorithm permitted identification of 93 (25%) patients who were ready to extubate, while their clinicians predicted a duration of ventilation higher than 24 h.© 2022. The Author(s).
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.