• Costa JacobsohnGwenGBerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin., Apoorva P Maru, Rebecca K Green, Angela N Gifford, Matthew D Lukasik, Tikiri Bandara, Thomas V Caprio, Amy L Cochran, Jeremy T Cushman, JonesCourtney M CCMCDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York., KindAmy J HAJHDepartment of Medicine (Geriatrics and Gerontology), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.Center for Health Disparities Research, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madis, Michael Lohmeier, and Manish N Shah.
• BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
• Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023 Jan 1; 27 (7): 841850841-850.

ObjectiveWe assessed fidelity of delivery and participant engagement in the implementation of a community paramedic coach-led Care Transitions Intervention (CTI) program adapted for use following emergency department (ED) visits.MethodsThe adapted CTI for ED-to-home transitions was implemented at three university-affiliated hospitals in two cities from 2016 to 2019. Participants were aged ≥60 years old and discharged from the ED within 24 hours of arrival. In the current analysis, participants had to have received the CTI. Community paramedic coaches collected data on program delivery and participant characteristics at each transition contact via inventories and assessments. Participants provided commentary on the acceptability of the adapted CTI. Using a multimethod approach, the CTI implementation was assessed quantitatively for site- and coach-level differences. Qualitatively, barriers to implementation and participant satisfaction with the CTI were thematically analyzed.ResultsOf the 863 patient participants, 726 (84.1%) completed their home visits. Cancellations were usually patient-generated (94.9%). Most planned follow-up visits were successfully completed (94.6%). Content on the planning for red flags and post-discharge goal setting was discussed with high rates of fidelity overall (95% and greater), while content on outpatient follow-up was lower overall (75%). Differences in service delivery between the two sites existed for the in-person visit and the first phone follow-up, but the differences narrowed as the study progressed. Participants showed a 24.6% increase in patient activation (i.e., behavioral adoption) over the 30-day study period (p < 0.001).Overall, participants reported that the program was beneficial for managing their health, the quality of coaching was high, and that the program should continue. Not all participants felt that they needed the program. Community paramedic coaches reported barriers to CTI delivery due to patient medical problems and difficulties with phone visit coordination. Coaches also noted refusal to communicate or engage with the intervention as an implementation barrier.ConclusionsCommunity paramedic coaches delivered the adapted CTI with high fidelity across geographically distant sites and successfully facilitated participant engagement, highlighting community paramedics as an effective resource for implementing such patient-centered interventions.

13 keywords...

hide…