• Am J Emerg Med · Sep 2022

    Matrix metalloproteinase-9 and substance-P as predictors for early-stage diagnosis of acute mountain sickness.

    • Mücahit Avcil, Akın Yolcubal, Yunus Emre Özlüer, and Çağaç Yetiş.
    • Aydın Adnan Menderes University Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Efeler, Aydın, Turkey.
    • Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Sep 1; 59: 100105100-105.

    IntroductionAlthough acute mountain sickness (AMS) can be a life-threatening condition, early diagnosis is difficult due to vague and non-specific symptoms. The aim of this study is to investigate biochemical markers that can detect high-altitude diseases in advance. Eight different biomarkers (BNP, HIF-1α, NGAL, MMP-3, MMP-9, SESN2, substance P (SP), and U-II) were studied, and their relationship with AMS was investigated.MethodsOf the 84 mountaineers who participated in the mountaineering training organized by the Turkish Mountaineering Federation in the Rize Kaçkar Mountains in 2018, 52 volunteered to participate in the study. Twelve hours after the participants reached an altitude of 2200 m (exposed to moderate hypoxia), their vital parameters were measured, and blood samples were taken for biochemistry tests. Vital signs and Lake Louise (LL) AMS scores were recorded every 24 h during the following 72 h. The participants were divided into two groups according to their LL scores: those with AMS and those without (AMS+ and AMS -), and the vital parameters and biomarker levels of both groups were compared and evaluated.ResultsOf the volunteers participating in the study, 35 (67.3%) were male and 17 (32.7%) were female, although there was no gender difference in terms of susceptibility to AMS. Among the investigated markers in the AMS + group, MMP-9 and SP were statistically significantly higher (p = 0.037 and p = 0.038, respectively). There were no statistical differences between AMS- and AMS+ groups with regard to heart rate, oxygen saturation, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure values (p = 0.507, p = 0.929, p = 0.955, p = 0.572, respectively).ConclusionThere were significant differences between the AMS- and AMS+ groups in terms of MMP-9 and SP. However, differences in physical indexes between the groups were not statistically significant. This could provide objective indexes for scanning and screening individuals susceptible to AMS in the early stages of rapid ascending.Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.