-
Critical care medicine · Nov 2022
Development and Validation of the Medical Emergency Team-Risk Prediction Model for Clinical Deterioration in Acute Hospital Patients, at Time of an Emergency Admission.
- Joshua Allen, Judy Currey, Daryl Jones, Julie Considine, and Liliana Orellana.
- Deakin University, School of Nursing and Midwifery and Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute for Health Transformation, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
- Crit. Care Med. 2022 Nov 1; 50 (11): 158815981588-1598.
ObjectivesTo develop and validate a prediction model to estimate the risk of Medical Emergency Team (MET) review, within 48 hours of an emergency admission, using information routinely available at the time of hospital admission.DesignDevelopment and validation of a multivariable risk model using prospectively collected data. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis recommendations were followed to develop and report the prediction model.SettingA 560-bed teaching hospital, with a 22-bed ICU and 24-hour Emergency Department in Melbourne, Australia.PatientsA total of 45,170 emergency admissions of 30,064 adult patients (≥18 yr), with an inpatient length of stay greater than 24 hours, admitted under acute medical or surgical hospital services between 2015 and 2017.Measurements And Main ResultsThe outcome was MET review within 48 hours of emergency admission. Thirty candidate variables were selected from a routinely collected hospital dataset based on their availability to clinicians at the time of admission. The final model included nine variables: age; comorbid alcohol-related behavioral diagnosis; history of heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or renal disease; admitted from residential care; Charlson Comorbidity Index score 1 or 2, or 3+; at least one planned and one emergency admission in the last year; and admission diagnosis and one interaction (past history of COPD × admission diagnosis). The discrimination of the model was comparable in the training (C-statistics 0.82; 95% CI, 0.81-0.83) and the validation set (0.81; 0.80-0.83). Calibration was reasonable for training and validation sets.ConclusionsUsing only nine predictor variables available to clinicians at the time of admission, the MET-risk model can predict the risk of MET review during the first 48 hours of an emergency admission. Model utility in improving patient outcomes requires further investigation.Copyright © 2022 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.