• Journal of neurosurgery · Mar 2023

    Successful retrograde regeneration using a sensory branch for motor nerve transfer.

    • Saud Alzahrani, Harley Brito da Silva, Tak-Ho Chu, Zain Tariq, Daniel Umansky, David A Elliott, and Rajiv Midha.
    • 1Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary.
    • J. Neurosurg. 2023 Mar 1; 138 (3): 858867858-867.

    ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to test whether regenerating motor axons from a donor nerve can travel in a retrograde fashion using sensory branches to successfully reinnervate a motor nerve end organ.MethodsThis study has two parts. In part I, rats (n = 30) were assigned to one of five groups for obturator nerve (ON)-to-femoral nerve transfer: group 1, ON-to-saphenous nerve (SN) distal stump; group 2, ON-to-SN proximal stump without femoral nerve proper (FNP) injury; group 3, ON-to-SN proximal stump with FNP crush injury; group 4, ON-to-SN proximal stump with FNP transection injury; and group 5, gold standard transfer, ON-to-motor femoral nerve (MFN) branch. At 8 weeks, retrograde labeling was done from the distal MFN, and the spinal cords were examined to assess the degree of obturator motor axon regeneration across the five groups. In part II, only group 4 was examined (n = 8). Through use of immunostaining and optical tissue clearing methods, the nerve transfer networks were cleared and imaged using light-sheet fluorescence microscopy to visualize the regeneration pathways in 2D and 3D models at 2- and 8-week time points.ResultsProximal FNP transection (group 4) enabled a significantly higher number of retrogradely regenerated motor axons compared with control groups 1-3. Moreover, group 4 had modest, but nonsignificant, superiority of motor neuron counts compared with the positive control group, group 5. Optical tissue clearing demonstrated that the axons traveled in a retrograde fashion from the recipient sensory branch to the FNP mixed stump, then through complex turns, down to distal branches. Immunostaining confirmed the tissue clearing findings and suggested perineurium disruption as a means by which axons could traverse across fascicular boundaries.ConclusionsSensory branches can transmit regenerating axons from donor nerves back to main mixed recipient nerves, then distally toward target organs. The extent of retrograde regeneration is markedly influenced by the type and severity of injury sustained by the recipient nerve. Using a sensory branch as a bridge for retrogradely regenerating axons can open new potential horizons in nerve repair surgery for severely injured mixed nerves.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…