-
- Carmen Popa, Robert Fischer, Shamai Kurbitaeva, and Keyvan Ravakhah.
- From St. Vincent Charity Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
- South. Med. J. 2022 Aug 1; 115 (8): 593-596.
ObjectivesCommon variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is one of the most common primary immunodeficiencies encountered by physicians, yet it is still poorly described and vastly underdiagnosed and underreported. It is characterized by low levels of immunoglobulins IgG, IgM, and IgA, recurrent infections, and an increased incidence of autoimmune conditions and malignancies. Diverse clinical presentation, poor understanding of its true prevalence, and the daunting, rarely ordered, diagnostic testing make this disease incredibly difficult to diagnose in a primary care setting. Our objectives in this study were to establish a simple marker that can be used in a primary care setting to raise suspicion of CVID and prompt further diagnostic testing and to demonstrate that the true prevalence of CVID is much higher than previously reported.MethodsData on 441 patients who underwent Ig electrophoresis testing during a 4-year period were analyzed retrospectively for the presence of hypogammaglobulinemia and number of clinic visits for infectious processes.ResultsThe average number of clinic visits before testing in patients with no identified antibody deficiency was 1.89 and in patients with any deficiency 2.22. The odds ratio for each additional visit was 1.089, which was not statistically significant (P = 0.103). When the data were recoded to be capped at 6 clinic visits, the odds ratio for each visit up to 6 was 1.119, which was marginally significant (P = 0.058).ConclusionsPatients with Ig deficiencies tend to have a higher number of office visits related to infectious processes. This difference, however, was not statistically significant in our study, likely because of the small number of participants. Our study also demonstrated that the prevalence of CVID is likely much higher than currently reported, and it highlights the difficulties related to the convoluted diagnostic process of this disease.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.