• Jessica Caline Lemos Macedo, Daniela Arruda Soares, Vivian Carla Honorato Dos Santos de Carvalho, Taciana Borges Andrade Cortes, Sóstenes Mistro, Clavdia Nicolaevna Kochergin, Davi Rumel, and Marcio Galvão Oliveira.
• Master's Program in Collective Health, Multidisciplinary Health Institute, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil.
• Patient Prefer Adher. 2022 Jan 1; 16: 1831-1842.

PurposeThis study aims to assess self-care in patients with non-optimal diabetes management (HbA1c >7.0% for adults and >8.0 for those aged 60 or over) and the positive and negative experiences associated with it in the rural communities of a Brazilian municipality.Patient And MethodsThis is a cross-sectional mixed-methods study. The data were collected from participants with high HbA1c through focus group discussions, subsequently performing thematic analysis, and through structured questionnaires (socioeconomic characteristics and the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA)).ResultsThe mean HbA1c of the 156 study participants was 9.94% (95% confidence interval: 9.70-10.19%) and most participants (86.54%) had negative self-care behaviors, with an overall SDSCA mean score of 3.55. This mean was not positive for any of the socioeconomic characteristics. The self-care activities with the most satisfactory performance concerned non-smoking and the use of prescribed medications, and the poorest results were observed for the practice of specific physical activities. The qualitative data indicated that the study participants face many difficulties regarding self-care practices, especially those related to an adequate diet.ConclusionThe self-care assessment revealed unsatisfactory self-care behaviors as well as high HbA1c levels among the study participants and highlighted the various difficulties they encounter. This indicates the need for more attentive health teams to monitor patients, especially regarding actions focused on the non-pharmacological elements of self-care, such as lifestyle changes, which were found to be the dimensions with the most unsatisfactory results.© 2022 Macedo et al.

4 keywords...

hide…